← Back to Kinfonet

Why Don't We Change After All These Years?

I’ll go with his second possibility rather than the first one: deep conditioning. It has to be remembered here that we are up against something that he wasn’t. Somehow as a child he avoided the conditioning that it seems we all received. So that was something he did not have to overcome. As it always has been we are on our own in this journey. It is this very conditioning that “terminates” the insight through thought’s conclusions as he has said…

“Now, if I radically change, surely that would affect the rest of the country, the rest of man(kind). So, what don’t you change?” asked Krishnamurti.

The above question from Krishnamurti was asked after he had pointed out the fractious state of the world in which we live without our seeming to care about our horrendous condition. Therefore, the change he was talking about must be the transformation from our careless, superficial, psychologically-conditioned, individualistic consciousness to …what?

What is that conditioning that you assume Krishnamurti had avoided as a child? If we know what that conditioning is, something that we are supposed to be suffering from, we can end it. Right?

I’ m afraid it’s you Sree :pensive:

2 Likes

We know that the brains of monks and others who are serious about meditation develop new neural circuits and abandon old ones. They change significantly - perhaps radically.

Krishnamurti’s teaching points to meditation, the observation of the mind’s activity. So to live the teaching is to be in a state of meditation, because to be in the usual, disorderly state of mind is insanity.

The meditative mind does not imagine what change is or lament that it hasn’t changed because learning about itself is changing. “The seeing is the doing”.

This is surely true. But the problem is what is a meditative mind? I. e. what is meditation? I’ve practiced various forms of so called “meditation” and found some kind of temporary peace. It was a refuge from the disorder and disturbances of the world. After a while I releazed I was ipnotizing myself and quit it. At a certain level it’s better than the caos of “normal” life. It’s good to have a refuge in time of difficulties. But it does not solve the problem.

I’ve met some Buddhist monks, nice people. We did meditation together, vipassana, perhaps the best traditional form of meditation because is based on awareness. Still it is a mechanical practice, like all practices. Some aspects of it were even ridiculous like when you have to imagine to give your love to your neighbours and then gradually to the whole world. Such a nice intention! But you cannot pretend or fake love! An imagined love is not love.

So let’s go back to K. I’ve pondered a lot about K.'s teachings about meditation. His descriptions of that are not homogeneous, they vary from time to time and from one interlocutor to another, and it must be so.
But I think that this caused some false interpretations. Many people I met in the K.'s circles thought that it was useless to sit and observe one’s thoughts, so they did nothing. It’s true that K. warned us of the dangers of a mechanical practice, especially when it’s done with a motive. And furthermore one can observe one’s own thought during the whole day, while walking, eating or doind anything, so sitting is not so strictly necessary, yet he often stressed the necessity to stop and sit down for a while… and he wanted that in the Study centre in Brokwood there had to be a special room to be used as a meditation room. I was surprised during my visit in Brockwood to find no people in that room…

1 Like

Having no goal.

K’s teaching always seemed to be asking questions - and we are in the habit of answering questions and solving mysteries with our intellect - we depend on our thoughts and our knowledge to provide us with solutions.

We look to our thoughts as if understanding is hidden within them.

Meditation is not an activity of the self - if I am observing my thoughts - this is just extra confusion on top of confusion.

PS - The only true meditation in a traditional form that I have come across is Zazen : just sitting, with the added instruction of “no goal”.

Why Don’t We Change After All These Years?

Fear of Annihilation. Dependance on thought. Dependance on existing as myself. Confusion as to what I am. And self satisfaction

No doubt about that. But it doesn’t end there…
Far from me solving mysteries with our intellect. As you can understand from my reply to Inquiry I’ve tried several “paths”. I sat with no goal in mind. First thought which came after a while was: “what am I doing here?” (:slight_smile: I’ve seen people during Buddhist meditation which forced themselves to stay seated and to stay awake… no goal, yes, but the mind has its laws and its demands. We can’t ignore them. A moltitude of thoughts invade our consciousness… maybe you remember that you left your garage open and want to go and close it, may be there are hurts from the past araising… you can’t ignore them. You have to learn how to stay with “what is”, the buddhists say you have to welcome everything that comes. So observe your thoughts without giving them importance, let them come and let them go.
That is what K. said in many of his talks. Sometimes he called it meditation, sometimes said “no, that’s not meditation”, according to who he was speaking with. The usefulness here (but not the goal) is that the mind slows down so that you can be more aware of your thoughts, feeling, etc. Then there is all the rest K. pointed out, like observing yourself in the mirror of relationship (and sometimes he called that too “meditation”) and having a revolution of values… there are things which are necessary but not sufficient, and they must be done. No steps will lead us to the meditative state. It happens spentaneously.

1 Like

It is my judgement that keeps me away from the meditative state.

PS- When there is awareness there are no thoughts to be found

Than stay with your judgement and forget the meditative state.

How do I stay with my judgement?

PS - Sorry - maybe you thought I was complaining about judgement and meditation - I was just trying to describe the issue at hand.

No need to be sorry, you pointed out important things and I think this discussion may help each other to go deeper into this matter. Neither of us has the complete view, one may see one thing and the other a different one equally important. Our replies are complementary I think.

Judgement is just an activity of the mind, let it happen, observe it when it comes without reacting: I must not judge". This is choiceless awareness, isn’t it?

“if I am observing my thoughts - this is just extra confusion on top of confusion.”

Of course there is confusion. But if you don’t react - and that means the ego, you, is not operating, you can stay with that too.

1 Like

Judging is bad :rofl:

If judging is bad, calling it “bad” is judging, which is bad.

Yes - it was a poor attempt at humor.

Only thought can say there are no thoughts to be found

Yes, Krishnamurti talked about how he was vacant as a child and conditioning just washed over him. So can we ever be free of our conditioning or is this someting that is innate and cannot be changed?

I had thought the same the first time I read his biography. And it’s also a thing which has been debated a lot in the K.'s circles and by K. himseld. He used to say: “K. might be a biological freak”. So must we conclude there is no hope for us?

From what I gathered in his talks he opened a door for us, something probably we could not do by ourselves. The door is still open, maybe only for a short while…

Yes - we are constantly trying to make sense of stuff