We have bunch of regulars who chat for entertainment . Is this what K wanted us to do? Of course not.
1 Like
I too have observed this. Slaves of words caught under the fascination of the conceptual thinking. Wonder is this fascination has something to do with the âwrong turnâ K spoke of. But this is just part of it, there is also what we meet âout thereâ. Can´t remember the talk or dialogue but I can recall K saying somewhere that people going into this enquiry or investigation are very bold people because we are simple, ordinary people going against renowned scientists, psychologists and the whole cosmic stream of thought in general. This is what it is. A real challenge.
Say I miraculously realize that I have an old Brain that most of the day is occupied with the old . Old memories, old reactions old words ,old conclusions .
Does that realization act?
Action comes from the integrity between realization and the organs of action. Which means between the mind and the backbone. Both figuratively and physically.
Without a sturdy backbone no ârealizationâ can act. To believe there is a realization which will miraculously starting acting and will free you from your deficiencies is a belief in woo. Youâve made your own K-woo.
So it seems, you will only be occupied with the âoldâ. Youâre the old. And you will always be on the lookout for âsomeone to talk toâ like a poster was mentioning on this thread . Of course only talk about the old as you lack any renewal. Since your life has now been reduced only to âtalkingâ, it becomes very important to ensure its continuity. You canât stop even if you wanted to. 
So what now? Well, a backbone seems essential.
So you have realized or merely agreeing with what was said that you are the old Brain and nothing else.
The question is that can you allow the truth to act or you choose to remain as an analyzer different than the analyzed?
My actions/behavior show my realizations, not only my talking.
See if your old brain can be anything other than incoherent âtalkâ. Talk that has no support in actions. Evidently a talk, that is in contradiction, to your actions.
The question is about the questioner. The questioner being nothing than the old washed out brain/persona. But seems you are better off directing your âquestionsâ to old washed out responders/ responses, like the one to whom you were talking before me. Seek the oldâŚand youâre in good company.
All bone-heads would agree.
3 Likes
Could you say something that makes sense ? What on earth is K-woo?
1 Like
Is it a dissipation of time and ultimately our lives? Often I feel time spent on the internet is mere entanglement.