Doubt implies hesitation, being careful, watchful. The past has no such quality because it comes in very quickly and has a lot of images behind it. The past is not just a cold conceptual construct; it has its own movement and energy; it is both the experiencer and the doubter. The past is you; you are the past. So you cannot apply doubt. You can apply only your knowledge, which in relationship means the application of many images.
Can I watch and listen without motive? I don’t apply anything at all to the question, certainly not doubt. The answer is doubtful when it remains purely conceptual, which for most of us is an acceptable form of answer. But we have at this moment only the question.
I would say that he’s physically and psychologically free to roam within a limited physical and limited psychological area. Freer than leashed, but not 100% free.
It appears to be the entity that ‘presides over’ my body-mind. What it really is, if it really is … I don’t know!
I’m assuming that dogs, like humans, have limited psychological freedom. A dog might be free to roam wherever they want, but be afraid to be too far from their master.
Probably all of us here believe (hope) the self ends; we are selves hoping for redemption, absolution, freedom, though we honestly don’t know whether it ends, or what that might actually mean other than relief.
Surely that entirely depends on who we are - as in where we have been conditioned to be left.
My reaction to the situation is dependant on how I have been programmed to react. We have no choice in the matter, the hand is the puppet. (or in kinder, grandmotherly terms : the observer is the observed)
Seeing what disappointment is, not running away or trying to avoid it or trying to find solutions to it.
If I don’t know what to do - then maybe I will be motivated to gain that knowledge? But what if I realise that distress is implicit in knowledge?
Then I really don’t know what to do - what am I motivated to do then?
Sivaram spoke about a learning that was automatic. What you describe is not automatic, at least not for people who haven’t trained themselves to introspect in a certain way.
Sivaram will have to say what he means - at a guess he just meant that the subjective experience of disapointment will automatically come to us all.
I suggest opium - Sorry, but do we want to understand or escape? If you are following carefully, you should at least have grasped that escape only leads back to you.
(Opium sounds delightful, if there were a den near me I’d give it a go.)
Regardless of whether attempting to lessen the pain works or fails, if I were in a lot of pain, that would probably be my top priority, to lessen/stop it. That just seems like common sense to me, why would you do otherwise? (Unless, of course, you were a masochist, but then the pain wouldn’t really be pain, it would be pleasure, right?)