So, are you saying that the child is incapable of thinking for himself and therefore has to be taught to think…
…and that the child is totally disabled from questioning that “teaching” about “what to say or think”?
Again, is the child totally disabled to respond to that pressure?
What does “unusually intelligent” have to do here, if I may ask?
Are you absolutely sure about this? … Why?
I’m saying that the child is not taught how to think but what to think and what to say, which means obeying authority rather than discovering things for oneself.
…and that the child is totally disabled from questioning that “teaching” about “what to say or think”?
I don’t know about “totally disabled” but most very young children are more inclined to believe and trust than to question.
Are you absolutely sure about this?
I’m not “absolutely sure” about anything. The only thing I know for sure is that I can be mistaken.
We know it but we don’t really know anything until there’s silence: no thought reminding us of what we think we know.
Who wrote it?..
Any comments on the difference between the black version and the white version?
Does it really matter? 
[fill in to reach the 20 characters needed to post]
It matters to me. Is that okay with you?
Nice reaction. Anyway no prob here, you can do as you please of course!
By the way, my question had nothing to do with you, but with the issue of giving more importance to an authority, than to the meaning of the said…