We’ve all had glimpses of what’s beyond the contents of consciousness.
I guess I will live with curiosity about it, watch it, explore it, and accept it.
Is the “I” watching, exploring, accepting the self = the self being watched, explored, accepted?
What do I see when I watches I? I knows what it sees is automatically distorted, denied, or dismissed by its conditioning, so it’s no more than an echo. That gives one pause before outwardly reacting, good for minding one’s manners, but is it self-knowledge or just self-regulation?
When i see watches i realize i don’t need them i’m always in time. 
Is there any thing that can see “I” without distortion? Is the best we can do to see the distortion?
Non-dual humor? 
To see the distortion in its entirety is to be free because there is no seeing when there is distortion. Distortion goes on in the dark, hidden from itself by the belief that not seeing is believing.
Is the “I” the distortion? A product of, or the distortion itself?
I don’t know if it matters.
But assuming it does, we know the distortion is brought about by beliefs, assumptions, biases, prejudices, etc., the contents of consciousness, so would that mean I is the personification, the voice, of the distortion mechanism?
Is the I the personification and the personifier?
It’s consciousness–all of it (the self, the I, the me, the doing).
Yes, e.g., the thinker is the thought, the observer is the observed, etc.
Harmful to whom, if I may ask, that which is harmful does not appear subjectively?
So let me ask again, what is danger?
Who told you that your self (i.e. you) must annihilate itself (i.e. commit suicide) to be free of whatever it is you want to be free of? I’m really curious!
Is K’s teaching something to be liked or disliked? 
What man was Krishnamurti, if I may ask?
May I ask why you look for meaning in life?
The self accepting itself or the self justifying itself?
OK, you don’t know what love is… now could you explain from where you say this 
?
And this ?
1 Like
If you refer to my reply to Ceklata on the 19th:
according to K, love is beyond the brain, and since I am confined and limited to the contents of consciousness of this brain, I don’t know what love is.
Good morning @Inquiry … may I know why you repeat the same speech you did already in #77 and #79, instead of answering my simple question?
1 Like
You may label it as such but that was not what happened and has been occurring more and more recently.
It’s something like taking a specific word or phrase out of context and placing it in another which gives that one word a totally different meaning.
It happens very spontaneously and is always surprising to me too.
And indeed it works on the funny bone of those present.
The subject and the object are unified?
or
The subject and the object are one?
or
There is no subject, there is no object?