You are presuming I don’t know the meaning of “immensurable”! (
and you are presuming I did not understand your argument about measure, thought and time…
God bless you Kimo and your naivety.
Speculation: I think I read all your posts about this issue with JP, and it’s just a futile and stubborn way to approach K.'s teaching. I already explained to you why but I’ll try a second time.
K.'s intention in that speech, like in all his speeches, was that of pointing out the cause of our pshycological problem and of our conflicts. This is the main point, the main issue, the ONLY thing which is important, pratical, real.
All your argument deals with side issues (like the definition of chronological time) which have no importance in helping ourselves to know how our mind works and so to find a solution. And this is mere futile speculation. Speculation can be useful if and only leads to some practical realization otherwise is a waste of time. Can you see this point?
As I have said, the main important point is to understand the difference between time by the watch, I. e. time which can be measured, and an immaginary time we introduce to achieve our ambitions and so on. If you have understood this, there is nothing else to be understood but only the practical work to see this phenomenon in yourself. All the rest is - to use an expression we have in Italy - intellectual masturbation.