Well, it appears to me that you rejected K’s very simple explanation of time, both kinds. I don’t agree with or see why you would divide what K has said into " the letter of his teaching than to its intention." This is a false division and an attempt to fragment what K has pointed out.
Also, what K pointed out is very much like science or was science. Dr. Bohm, a theoretical physicist who’s interest was the quantum theory, was drawn to K. Some of the things K pointed out were even similar to what physics had come to.
Also, K saw things, not as a theory or philosophy but as truth. For example; we are conditioned by our experiences and knowledge. Dr. Bohm compared K’s teachings to several theories held by science and when I find where I read this I will be glad to provide a citation. In the meantime, since you seem to have your own unshakable interpretation in what K pointed out, I don’t see any point in going on with responding to your posts.