Makes sense, right: A transformative revelation is catastrophic to our old way of being?
Depends how you ‘plunge’? If you dive in and wallow, you’ll probably run into the Abyss. But if you get your spelunking gear on and explore nonindulgently, you might avoid crashing. That said, I think exploring the dark side often involves suffering. It’s dark for a reason!
I dunno about ‘necessarily’ but often, for sure. Unless we are able to indulge intelligently?
I think it’s a tough call whether to back off (go silent) or forge ahead (go straight to the deep end) when you run into something that you sincerely think-believe-know(?) is not correct or true. People get emotionally attached to their views, they identify with them. When you find flaws in their views, they may interpret it (consciously or unconsciously) as an attack, and react defensively, maybe even offensively, tit for tat. And then all Hell can break loose. On the other hand, remaining silent when you see something you find wrong/untrue limits the scope of your expression and the forum’s field of exploration. I usually choose silence over forging ahead to avoid the stress and the intimacy that comes from ‘duking it out’ with someone.
By plunge I mean : allow oneself, no restraint, to do things that you wanna do. No need to have the motive to get to the “dark side” either - but if you do x, and it leads to the bright and wonderful side (whatever that is), it doesn’t count.
Intelligently means not to over indulge; avoidance of indulgence. restraint. Or happily avoid, in the understanding of the complete equation regarding indulgence.
That would be a really interesting experiment: Take the path of least resistance. Flow like water.
Indulge means allow yourself to enjoy, take pleasure in. Is it intelligent to avoid enjoyment and pleasure? I hope not, that would make intelligence really boring!
Yes this is any normal human’s view - the fear of missing out. Buddhism and K at its simplest is the idea that seeing clearly what desire is about frees us from this fear.
That everything (even joy) is tainted by greed/fear when it is our ground of action, when we don’t see all the implications, when we are ignorant of our blinders, seeing only that I must have what I want.
Why do we have to keep repeating this teaching? Do you think it is incorrect, or that another version is closer to the truth? Do you not get it ? Do you not believe it (because its too simplistic)?
seeing clearly what desire is about frees us from this fear
Do you think it is incorrect, or that another version is closer to the truth?
I think that it is a useful model for how the mind works. I don’t know how close to the truth it or any other version is. Some versions resonate more for me, some less.
Do you not get it ?
Well you know me, I cultivate not-getting things in the way they’re meant to be gotten.
Do you not believe it (because its too simplistic)?
I believe it’s a good model. Too simplistic? Maybe a bit too tidy and formulaic for my taste.
I assume you mean: “I cultivate not-getting things in the way they’re meant to be gotten.” ?
I am unsure why you think that’s my plan to become wise and free. I never said that afaik. Maybe you think that’s what I mean by my tone? I cultivate not-getting things in the way they’re meant to be gotten because I enjoy doing it, it energizes me, and bears tasty fruit. I post things like that here not to assert something, rather share a view that might resonate, as it did with you.
And say, Viswa is not/will not be stressed out of any forging ahead/go straight to the deep, would you push yourself to your end for learning as Viswa won’t be harmed by any of your words/actions/stress/duking it out?
Tasty fruit? How tasty it is?
Or not that tasty to your big family of brothers,sisters,parents,etc.?