Is there an awareness that psychological knowledge is divisive?

[Peter]

Thinking, actual contemplative thinking, is replaced with concepts, and theories, and an expectation for results. Thinking is not the conditioned thinking we are familiar with. Actually it is quite indicative of a correspondents condition to think they know what is communicated, while completely opposing any sense of earnest communion.

[Peter]

@Peter

In the field of thought there is the idealist and the realist. From reality there is an urge for the future ideal, and for the realist this is an ideal, not real.

This is called an insight. An insight into the true nature of the communication taking place, and a shortcut to a shared understanding, free from conditioning. It won’t be understood analytically. It won’t be understood without jumping into the flow of the communion together, and not looking for explanations and answers.

[pavanirao_gmail_com]

@Inquiry

I think that each one of us must look honestly at how much we think we know and understand about K’s teaching, then put all of it aside to find out if we have learned anything about what it means to be human, what we really need to know, and how much of our knowledge needs to be seen for what it is.

@Peter

Thinking is not the conditioned thinking we are familiar with. Actually it is quite indicative of a correspondents condition to think they know what is communicated, while completely opposing any sense of earnest communion.

That’s an interesting exchange of views / understanding shared between inquiry and Peter.

Wonder how much can get communicated to the mind which is stuck in its own groove of ’ concepts, ’ ’ ideas ’ and ’ thoughts ’

It does take courage, wisdom for one to see and acknowledge where and how one stands visa_ v - the teaching

[Peter]

What is found out in the course of a communication is something found, not between him or her, but in the communion, where there is no other.